I don't patronize bars, but my last job required I attend lots of conferences, and since everyone gravitated to the hotel bar to socialize, so did I. One evening the live music was provided by a young, clean-cut man who sang and played keyboards. He wasn't a prodigy. He wasn't going to be the next Elton John. He was a local boy who got a gig in a local hotel bar. But he was competent and enthusiastic and I loved his choice of songs. I told an employee sitting next to me how much I enjoyed the music.
"He's sometimes off key," she said. "And his range is limited. His voice is low-weight. It lacks distinctive timbre. Without timbre he'll go nowhere." She flicked her hand at him dismissively.
Turns out she had once worked as a background vocalist for a recording label. There were hundreds of women vying for her job, she told me. She left because the rewards didn't justify the effort. Her dream was to be a famous singer, not a background flunky. Now she worked for me, answering phones, greeting visitors, filing forms.
"He's not vocalizing," she complained. "He doesn't project from the chest. He just sits there and sings."
That he did. He sat there, he sang. I couldn't help noticing he was on stage, not she.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
On Stage
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

















12 comments:
Great message, thanks.
It's easy for anyone in a particular specialty--writing, music, painting, etc., to get caught up in an analysis of what's wrong with others, because we can see it. But it's a lot harder to look at what they're doing right. Whenever I hear writers take shots at bestsellers like Dan Brown or JK Rowling et al., I always think, you're really missing the point of what they're doing right. Sure, some of it was right place, right time, but they miss entirely what a great idea Brown had, both in the main character and the concept of the Da Vinci Code and the Sacred Feminine, or in JK Rowling's unusual ability to immerse the reader in her world (I DO NOT know how she does it, but she does it very damned well).
Plus, of course, it's all sour grapes and envy.
Heh heh. Gotta love this one. As the saying goes, 'Everyone's a critic'. What they're missing (and you hit it on the head so nicely) is that most critics are talking about it while they watch others doing it.
I have to say, though, in general, I have noticed a lot of successful singers who are males who can't sing. Just off the top of my head, I can think of ten big ones. Off the top of my head and with deep thinking, I can only think of one female who ever made it and who can't sing.
Stylistically, the male voice can be ugly and still be enjoyable and artistic. The female voice is such that if it doesn't have a pleasant sound to it, it's not at all enjoyable to listen to, no matter how artistic and nuanced the singer is.
It's not exactly fair, but it just is. What can you do?
There are great voices and there are great performances. Those with great voices who can put on great performances are rare.
Then there are the almost-runs, the wanna-bes who would rather sit around and point out the flaws in the ones who are actually doing the work.
This was great! Short and sweet and to the point. And what a wonderful point it is. :)
Spy,
Good point. I can list a lot of biggies who are men whose voices are pretty rough, but they bring something else to the mix: Springsteen, Dylan...
Wonderful message.
Excellent message, Stephen.
It's fun to complain about others, isn't it?
I recently saw someone congratulated for their talent. It bothered me because I know firsthand how hard this person had worked. Talented, yes, but the work was what counted!
Great post. So true.
Reminds me of the Nike slogan, "Just Do It."
Post a Comment