Monday, June 29, 2009

Are We There Yet?

I got my edits Friday. I'd been waiting anxiously: what if the editor should want major changes? What if he should want a different title?

Now I know. He wants major changes. He wants a different title.

The book has been critiqued many times. Each time I've reacted in a kind of Kübler-Ross sequence of stages:

1. Denial: There's nothing wrong with my manuscript. My manuscript is peachy keen. YOU, on the other hand, are a work in progress.

2. Anger: You wouldn't tell John Grisham his characters are under motivated, would you? Would you? Didn't think so.

3. Bargaining: How about if the aliens land in chapter 23 instead of chapter 16?

4. Depression: Why did I ever quit my job at Chuck E. Cheese? I was up for assistant manager. Now I can't write my way out of a wet paper bag.

5. Acceptance: Oh, all right, I'll cut the three scenes that show how the neighbor's cousin became terrified of thimbles. Are you HAPPY?

I keep hearing from and about fellow bloggers who've finished their first novel and are getting ready to query. I grit my teeth. Some have checked all the boxes: they've participated in writers groups, employed beta readers, distanced themselves from the project, edited, edited, edited. Still I grit my teeth. Because for most of them, the climb has just begun.

There's a difference between the critiques you get from industry professionals and those you get from beta readers. No matter how brilliant the latter are, feedback from agents and editors always seems shockingly concise and penetrating by comparison. It illuminates fatal flaws in your manuscript, flaws everyone else inexplicably missed. You find yourself on the operating table, your innards exposed from belly to brisket, pleading to the surgeon:

How about if the aliens land in chapter 23 . . . ?

Each time I'm told I need to make a major change, one that involves extensive deletions or the construction of new scenes, I feel as though I've been kicked in the yarbles. I give myself a few minutes, an hour, a day—whatever it takes—and almost always I come to agree with the criticism. As I write this, it's been a couple of days since I received the Big Edit, and although I've got difficult work ahead of me, I agree it needs to be done. The problem, like all problems, is an opportunity in disguise: the book is going to be better as a result of the effort. So I'm grateful, I think.

Am I there yet?

No, this is actually the second edit at this house; I had to make major cuts to the manuscript before the publisher would take it on. Life is just a long sequence of edits, interrupted by headlong bursts of raw drivel. Anyone who says "my book is finished" is either holding a copy or holding onto a dream.



I won't rest until the Mormon Tabernacle Choir records "The Scrotum Song."

19 comments:

Lisa said...

Look at you! I have no doubt that by the final edit, the book is going to be terrific and will still be all you. I suspect there's a big difference between getting opinions from other unpublished writers and getting solid notes from the pros!

lennie said...

I say have the aliens come in chapter one, that way they can bother people all through the book!

PS- Just got back from Daytona Beach...so many memories

Erica Orloff said...

Hi Stephen:
Having both GIVEN those sorts of critiques, and recieved them, I take the Buddhist approach. When I hear from my editor, I read the letter in shock. Then I just "be" with it for a while--the very idea that this is going to change. I start to discern what seems like truth (Holy shit, my editor's right!) and what might not get done because the new organic story needs x or y. Once the whole thing gels in my head, I start. And you are right. Most people have no idea . . . .

E

BernardL said...

‘Anyone who says "my book is finished" is either holding a copy or holding onto a dream.’ Oh boy, is that ever true. You begin to wonder at what point in the editing rounds the story you originally wrote will cease to exist.

Stephen Parrish said...

Lisa: I've started working on the edits and . . . I'm having a good time!

Lennie: write me and tell me who you saw in Daytona.

When I hear from my editor, I read the letter in shock.

Erica: I was hoping to hear from you. I'm glad it's not just me.

You begin to wonder at what point in the editing rounds the story you originally wrote will cease to exist.

Bernard: mine has ceased to exist. Along the way I had to change the book I wanted to write (and wrote) to one that would get published.

Mark Terry said...

"Life is just a long sequence of edits, interrupted by headlong bursts of raw drivel."

It's a little long to fit on a business card, but it's a fair enough description of being a writer. Hey, it's what you wanted to do, right? You just forgot to read the job description all the way through.

Chris Eldin said...

I can't click on the Scrotum Song right now. But I look forward to it later...
heheheh

Not sure what to say... Erica has been there and done that, so I'm going with her advice.
:-)

Tena Russ said...

Oh, crap.

Sarah Laurenson said...

Glad you're enjoying the edits - now. It is a long road, but I think worth the journey. Let us know for sure on that one, ok?

I'd love to see them sing that song!

Stephen Parrish said...

Mark: I keep thinking about the last paragraph of Huckleberry Finn: ". . . so there ain't nothing more to write about, and I am rotten glad of it, because if I'd 'a' knowed what a trouble it was to make a book I wouldn't 'a' tackled it, and ain't a-going to no more."

Chris: "The Scrotum Song" would be a #1 hit if only a hot band would record it and all the radio stations in the country would play it.

Oh, crap.

Tena: maybe you'll be an exception.

Oh, I just got news of another debut author getting an offer. I can't say who, but this person has been pitching as long as I have. You only lose when you quit.

Sarah: odd thing is, I enjoy every aspect of this business except one: waiting for people to respond. That blows. Everything else, even spellchecking, is fun.

Tena Russ said...

Oh, crap.

Tena: maybe you'll be an exception.

As IF

Betsy Dornbusch said...

I've been on the giving side of those edits for a long time now. We tend to just fix the ms for our authors, and it's mostly cutting words. We don't take on stories that need major edits, even if the story is really great. So take heart, your story must be friggin' brilliant!

Ello said...

Stephen I've been wondering how it was going!!! I agree that querying is hell. But I now believe that submitting is the greater evil.

And speaking of editing, I am still revising from editorial feedback off of the first round of submissions. It feels like it is never ending!

I wish you the best of luck!

Dave said...

You know a lot more about the great novelists than I do, but I've read that at least some of them hate their finished product, and would love to edit it forever, or maybe throw it in the trash and start over. I guess we won't know about your attitudes toward your own work until your novel(s) have been on the library shelves for a few years. You're a damn good writer. You'll get through this.

Stephen Parrish said...

I've been on the giving side of those edits for a long time now.

The enemy is in our midst!

But I now believe that submitting is the greater evil.

You've got a reputable agent, Eato, so I think it's just a matter of time. What I like about submitting (other than waiting) is the anticipation.

Dave: thanks. I will get through it. And you will too.

Kim Stagliano said...

Oh boy. It doesn't get much easier as you progress toward publication, does it? Good luck with the edits. K

pjd said...

Holding on to a dream?
>raises hand<

That's why I'm not seriously querying right now. I don't want to let go of the dream. And that job at Chuck E. Cheese that I took after you left. That's my meal ticket, right there.

Melanie Avila said...

*has anxiety attack*

I've thought a lot about this. My aunt (who's published) beta'd a draft of my wip and the difference in her critiques compared with my unpublished friends was incredible. I could tell she'd been under an editor's knife and she really challenged me to improve my wip. I just hope it's good enough. :)

Barbara Martin said...

I have James A. Michener's Handbook on Writing where he provided an indepth look at the manuscript revisions required on a novella about the gold rush in the Canadian northwest. Thus, I have no delusions about my own work. I'm certain there are scads of places within that need an overhaul, tweaking and rewrites. I had a professional editor look at the first manuscript novel who provided a mark-up that initially left me in a state of shock. 'What has he done to my precious story?' He pointed out all the weak areas, why certain things didn't work, the cardboard voids I placed my readers in, and those pesky POVs.

That editor gave me invaluable advice which I can now apply to my newer manuscripts. The same with the rejection slips with scribbled in notes from editors. I'm willing to climb that mountain.